Skip to main content
Articles

Does Studying Multiple Sociolinguistic Varieties of a Second Language Impact Learning Outcomes? Investigating the Simultaneous Acquisition of Vocabulary in Both Standard and Egyptian Arabic

Author
  • Elizabeth Huntley (Michigan State University)

Abstract

Sociolinguistic variation is often ignored in standard language textbooks (Brown, 2011). Arabic, a diglossic language, exhibits considerable variation with a standardized formal register (Modern Standard Arabic, or MSA), and multiple spoken dialects (Badawi, 1973). Arabic foreign language programs have historically privileged MSA curricula at the expense of dialects. Recently, however, textbooks have begun integrating dialects and MSA. Although the integrated approach has been criticized for creating an unnecessary learning burden that inhibits acquisition, it has never been directly empirically evaluated. 

The current study is a lab-operationalized comparison of Arabic L2 vocabulary acquisition in MSA-only and integrated curricula. Twenty-six L1 speakers of English studied twenty-four Arabic nouns in two counterbalanced conditions: MSA-only (one register), and MSA + Egyptian Colloquial Arabic (ECA) (two registers). Participants were tested on form and meaning recognition. Accuracy and log reaction times for each the register-condition combinations (MSA-only, MSA-integrated, and ECA-integrated) were compared using one-way repeated measures ANOVAs. Results indicated no significant differences between any of the groups for either accuracy or reaction time apart from reaction time for form recognition. Results are discussed in light of theoretical models of the bilingual mental lexicon and pedagogical implications for the L2 classroom.

Keywords: Arabic, vocabulary, mental lexicon, diglossia, second language acquisition

How to Cite:

Huntley, E., (2024) “Does Studying Multiple Sociolinguistic Varieties of a Second Language Impact Learning Outcomes? Investigating the Simultaneous Acquisition of Vocabulary in Both Standard and Egyptian Arabic”, Critical Multilingualism Studies 11(1), 227-265.

Downloads:
Download PDF
View PDF

Published on
2024-02-07

Peer Reviewed

License