Articles

CLASSIFICATION OF BREAST LYMPHEDEMA IN A RACIALLY DIVERSE COHORT

Authors
  • J.G. Chen
  • C.B. Perez
  • A. Coogan
  • T. Kim
  • L. Sánchez-Johnsen
  • K. Ohara
  • C. Nelson
  • D.M. Rizzo
  • J. Matt
  • E.J. Watson
  • M.M. Sowden
  • T.P. Ahern

Abstract

Breast lymphedema is a common sequela of breast conservation that delays healing and reduces quality of life. No rigorous classification system exists for this condition. We explored approaches for classifying breast lymphedema based on breast ultrasound, physical exam, and patient-reported outcomes. We enrolled 80 patients from two institutions. Each site enrolled 30 invasive breast cancer patients treated with breast conservation and radiotherapy, and 10 control patients evaluated for benign breast complaints. All patients underwent bilateral breast ultrasound to measure dermal thickness and were assessed for physical signs of breast lymphedema. Patients reported quality of life impacts on standard questionnaires. We derived breast lymphedema classifiers using (1) a simple ultrasound-based metric of dermal thickness difference, and (2) a multiparameter machine learning classifier based on dermal thickness difference, physical exam, and patient-reported impacts. Ultrasound-defined breast lymphedema was present in 72% (95% CI: 59 to 82%) of invasive breast cancer patients. The multiparameter classifier identified three distinct patient groups: one with little evidence of breast lymphedema, and two with increasingly severe breast lymphedema. A simple ultrasound-based measure and a novel multiparameter classifier both show promise for rigorous classification of breast lymphedema and warrant further development in larger patient cohorts.

Keywords: Breast cancer, breast surgery, lymphedema, ultrasound, racial disparities

How to Cite:

Chen, J., Perez, C., Coogan, A., Kim, T., Sánchez-Johnsen, L., Ohara, K., Nelson, C., Rizzo, D., Matt, J., Watson, E., Sowden, M. & Ahern, T., (2024) “CLASSIFICATION OF BREAST LYMPHEDEMA IN A RACIALLY DIVERSE COHORT”, Lymphology 57(2), 84-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.2458/lymph.7092

Downloads:
Download PDF

60 Views

28 Downloads

Published on
13 Nov 2024
Peer Reviewed