Abstract
Arguing that Stanley stands for more than its narrow holding that a state cannot constitutionally make criminal the private possession of obscene materials, the writer contends that the Supreme Court has in this case significantly strengthened a constitutional right to privacy. The philosophical implications of the "thrust of Stanley" are examined as well as its impact on existing law in the areas of obscenity regulation, sex crimes, and other governmental regulation of private morality.
How to Cite
11 Ariz. L. Rev. 731 (1969)
747
Views
1264
Downloads