Abstract
The doctrines of personal jurisdiction that have developed over the years are both complex and confusing. The author examines these doctrines in light of the recent Supreme Court decisions in Shaffer v. Heitner and Kulko v. Superior Court and the decisions in several Arizona cases. A three-step analytical model is developed by the author to help unravel the complexities of personal jurisdiction.
How to Cite
20 Ariz. L. Rev. 861 (1978)
90
Views
54
Downloads