Abstract
The author examines the Supreme Court's decisions in United Steelworkers v. Weber and Fullilove v. Klutznick in terms of the constitutional and statutory issues left open by the Court in these cases. The constitutional or statutory validity of affirmative action plans "involuntarily" adopted by private employers at the behest of executive agencies is examined along with the question of what character or degree of federal agency involvement in inducing private affirmative action plans might be sufficient to raise these constitutional and statutory objections.
How to Cite
23 Ariz. L. Rev. 87 (1981)
17
Views
6
Downloads