Standardized Agreements and the Parol Evidence Rule: Defining and Applying the Expectations Principle
Articles
Standardized Agreements and the Parol Evidence Rule: Defining and Applying the Expectations Principle
Articles
Standardized Agreements and the Parol Evidence Rule: Defining and Applying the Expectations Principle

Abstract

This Article addresses Arizona's adoption of the reasonable expectations doctrine for standardized contract disputes in Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.. Citing the multiplicity of formulations of the doctrine, the authors suggest a new standard for honoring reasonable expectations which harmonizes with the parol evidence rule.

How to Cite

26 Ariz. L. Rev.  793 (1984)

Downloads

Download PDF

29

Views

10

Downloads

Share

Authors

Gary L. Birnbaum (Mariscal, Weeks, McIntyre, & Friedlander, P.A.)
Louis A. Stahl (Streich, Lang, Weeks & Cardon, P.A.)
Michael P. West (Mariscal, Weeks, McIntyre, & Friedlander, P.A.)

Downloads

Issue

Publication details

Pages 793–844
Published on 1984-11-01

Licence

All rights reserved

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: 50c33e6609b5aa6ed85002bf29c664fc