Skip to main content
The Erie Enigma: Appellate Review of Conclusions of Law

Abstract

This Essay challenges the Ninth Circuit's recent decision in The Matter of McLinn permitting de novo appellate review of district court state law determinations. Suggesting that this litigation burden is more appropriately placed on state courts, Professor Woods advocates a greater reliance on certification procedure.

How to Cite

26 Ariz. L. Rev.  755 (1984)

Downloads

Download PDF

25

Views

25

Downloads

Share

Authors

Winton D. Woods Jr. (University of Arizona)

Downloads

Issue

Publication details

Licence

All rights reserved

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: 7cfe2a30fb3b10481e6b09e8f78aff72