Skip to main content
A Re-Evaluation of Mathews v. Eldridge in Light of Administrative Shortcomings and Social Security Nonacquiescence

Abstract

Professor Kubitschek probes the area of Social Security law as governed by Mathews v. Eldridge. In disagreeing with the outcome of that case, she asserts that recipients of Social Security benefits are constitutionally entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to the termination of those benefits.

How to Cite

31 Ariz. L. Rev. 53 (1989)

Downloads

Download PDF

20

Views

16

Downloads

Share

Authors

Carolyn A. Kubitschek (Hofstra University)

Downloads

Issue

Publication details

Licence

All rights reserved

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: 63ee63b71c54048e3f76fc6734c70ba5