Abstract
Many scholars are finding Justice Scalia's insistence on "plain meaning" to be a welcome interpretive tool in controlling and constraining judicial decisionmaking. Professor D'Amato argues that such a tool will not do the job, that quantum theory shows the world itself cannot be encapsulated in verbal formulas, and, counterintuitively, enacting plainly-worded statutes to control behavior can result in a lessened degree of control.
How to Cite
33 Ariz. L. Rev. 529 (1991)
119
Views
82
Downloads