Abstract
This article analyzes and re-examines the numerous arguments for and against client-centered legal counseling. The author responds to criticisms of the concept that have emanated from both traditional and Critical Legal Studies perspectives, as well as from client-centeredness advocates themselves. He concludes that a client-centered counseling model can be justified in a number of circumstances so long as important contextual factors are considered. In the final part of the article, the author proposes a variation of the most popular client-centered counseling model that enhances the model's ability to facilitate client decisionmaking.
How to Cite
32 Ariz. L. Rev. 501 (1990)
127
Views
56
Downloads