Abstract
In his new book, Understanding Lawyers' Ethics, Professor Monroe Freedman maintains his position that the lawyer's duty to assist criminal defendants includes presenting perjurious testimony if the client insists. Professor Collett challenges Professor Freedman, arguing that he mistakenly defines the defendant's right as one to any conceivable defense, rather than a defense based upon the facts and law of the case. Professor Collett suggests that intentional denial of justice in the individual case is not the price of greater systemic justice, but rather a cause of less systemic justice.
How to Cite
33 Ariz. L. Rev. 455 (1991)
4
Views
2
Downloads