Skip to main content
The Constitutional Limits of Judicial Rulemaking: The Illegitimacy of Mass-Tort Settlements Negotiated under Federal Rule 23

Abstract

Many lower federal courts have in the last decade and a half made creative use of the class action to resolve mass tort disputes. The authors contend that the resolution of mass torts under Rule 23 is not legitimate; that any amendment to that rule legitimizing the resolution of mass torts as class actions would exceed rulemaking power of the Supreme Court under the Rules Enabling Act; and that any revision of the Rules Enabling Act to authorize such rulemaking might well be unconstitutional.

How to Cite

39 Ariz. L. Rev. 461 (1997)

Downloads

Download PDF

19

Views

9

Downloads

Share

Authors

Paul D. Carrington (Duke University)
Derek P. Apanovitch (Duke University)

Downloads

Issue

Publication details

Licence

All rights reserved

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: 6d93bb2c3f2c8c48f64c341d6067d666