Skip to main content
The "Great Writ" May Once Again Deliver Justice to the Most Deserving Prisoners: an Analysis of Arizona Criminal Rule of Procedure 31.2(b) in Light of Beam v. Paskett

Abstract

The Ninth Circuit, in Beam v. Paskett, found that a state supreme court's mandatory review of a death sentence creates a presumption that the state addressed unraised sentencing issues. This Note applies Beam's reasoning to Arizona's automatic review of death sentences under Arizona Criminal Rule of Procedure 31.2(b). The author concludes that, based on Arizona case law and public policy, those on Arizona's death row should be allowed to raise federal constitutional claims on federal habeas corpus appeal when their lawyers inadvertently fail to raise those claims before the Arizona state courts.

How to Cite

39 Ariz. L. Rev. 311 (1997)

Downloads

Download PDF

19

Views

11

Downloads

Share

Authors

Patrick M. Griego

Downloads

Issue

Publication details

Licence

All rights reserved

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: 86d7b2205d9046a2590207f5bdb373f4