Abstract
This Note critically examines the current United States Supreme Court framework used to determine when free expression can and should be curtailed. Specifically, the high versus the low value speech distinction is criticized as a false dichotomy. Using the judicial and academic debate concerning pornography regulation as a starting point, a new tripartite speech classification is proposed, one designed to meet the often-encountered criticisms of the current two-part system.
How to Cite
41 Ariz. L. Rev. 573 (1999)
3
Views
4
Downloads